Monthly Archives: June 2025

Review 229: The Murder of Roger Ackroyd

The Murder of Roger Ackroyd by Agatha Christie

I started reading this because of a student. This is not uncommon, of course – I’m an English teacher, so a lot of what I read these days is because of my students. But this time, rather than trying to find a book to teach, I was actually looking for a book to enjoy.

This student came to me asking if I had any book recommendations, which is an awfully broad question. So I asked her what she liked, and she said “Mystery.”

Mystery, unfortunately, is a genre in which I have little real experience. I read some Raymond Chandler a long time ago, but that’s about it, so I had no recommendations for her. Another English teacher, though, recommended this book and in doing so, planted the tiniest suggestion that led me to figure out who the killer was before Poirot go there.

That in no way took away from the fun of the story, of course. The whole point of reading one of these mysteries is not just to find out who did the terrible deed, but to see how the detective – the famous Hercule Poirot – works out all the details for himself.

This woman knows everything.

And that is what Christie accomplished. The Very British Village of King’s Abbot has seen its share of tragedy. The wealthy widow Mrs Ferrars has died, most likely by her own hand, following the death of her terrible husband. And while the town is reeling from this news, another unnatural death visits them. The titular Roger Ackroyd, a widower himself and a confidante of Mrs. Ferrars has been murdered with a knife to the neck!

The suspects are, of course, various. Was it the butler, looking for some scheme to blackmail money out of him? Was it Ackroyd’s stepson, looking to inherit his stepfather’s well-guarded wealth? Was it his niece, hoping to marry the stepson against Ackroyd’s wishes?

The cast is large, and the story is told through the eyes of the village’s doctor, James Sheppard. With his gossip-hungry sister Caroline prodding him along, he accompanies Poirot through his investigations, looking to find out who was in the summer house, what color the stepson’s boots were, who moved a chair a few inches, so as to discover the true identity of the murderer.

There’s not a whole lot more to say about the plot or some of the narrative choices by Christie without spoiling the ending, so I won’t. What I can say is that Christie’s reputation as one of the great British mystery writers is certainly well-deserved, and there’s a reason why she is one of the best choices for a beach read or a long airplane trip.

The book is fast-paced and very readable, and if the plot does get somewhat convoluted at times, she makes sure to have Poirot (or someone similiar) re-familiarize us with the details of what is known and what is yet unknown, so that we may follow along in the same way that Dr. Sheppard does.

That doesn’t mean we can deduce things the way Poirot does – there are plenty of details that we would consider insignificant that only carry true weight once all has been revealed in a classic Drawing Room, “One of you is the murderer” scene at the end.

What’s more, Christie has carefully built the story to be re-readable. Once you know everything at the end of the book, you can go back and see characters and events in a whole new light. No detail, however insignificant, is wasted. While I think this is often the case for a murder mystery, it is done especially well here.

This guy doesn’t know half as much as Christie does.

This book has been in publication so long that I think it’s actually in the public domain now, so you don’t really need me to recommend it. At one point there was a whole literary society dedicated to discussing Christie’s work – my praise of the book isn’t going to move too many needles.

If you want an entertaining mystery with lots of suspects, twists, turns, and surprises, though, you can’t go wrong with this one. It’s a mystery that respects the reader, rewards close attention to detail, and is still surprising readers.

For those of us who are not regular visitors to the Mystery genre, this is a great place to begin. Christie’s careful and methodical storytelling have kept generations of readers enthralled, and will no doubt make her one of your favorites as well.

Leave a comment

Filed under Agatha Christie, classics, mystery

Review 228: The Rise and Fall of the Galactic Empire

The Rise and Fall of the Galactic Empire by Chris Kempshall

The best fictional worlds invite you to lose yourself in them. They get into your head, makes you wonder what else is there, between the words on the page and beyond the beginning and the end.

Star Wars, of course, is exactly that kind of fiction. What started with a fairly simple space adventure nearly fifty years ago has blossomed into an expansive, living universe, where every new story carries within it the seeds for another story and another one after that. Through the media of film and television, animation and comic books, novels and short stories, Star Wars has built up a world and a history that you could spend your entire life exploring.

Kempshall reflects in the afterward that, for the time he was working on it, it became his whole life. And I certainly can’t blame him for it.

The Rise and Fall of the Galactic Empire is a thorough, insightful history of the Empire from inside the Star Wars universe. Written by historian Beaumont Kin soon after the fall of the New Republic, the Battle of Exegol, and the (probably) final death of Emperor Palpatine, this book attempts to understand how the Empire arose, what its means and methods were, and why, even after the Battle of Endor, its ideology persisted and became the First Order.

It begins with an examination of Sheeve Palpatine and how he rose to power. With the advantage of time, and the testimony of people like Luke Skywalker and Leia Organa, Kin is able to see the Senator from Naboo for who he really was – a master of the Dark Side of the Force, apprentice to a terrible Sith lord, who had decided from his early years that he wanted only one thing: complete mastery of the Galaxy. It follows his career through the Clone Wars, a conflict in which Palpatine, acting as both the Supreme Chancellor and the malicious Darth Sidious, was controlling both sides.

With his power assured, the history then goes on to explore how the Empire functioned, how it expanded, and how it devoured everything in its way. An Empire which rewarded cruelty, blind loyalty, and rampant consumption was everything that Palpatine wanted, and its apotheosis was the Death Star.

Nevertheless, there was resistance, and the history explores that as well. How even with an Empire so comfortable with conflict and aggression might still miss the signs of organized rebellion and even encourage it with its unrepentant use of force and terror.

From there, the book chronicles the assumptions and errors that the Empire made in dealing with the Rebellion, how the loss of figures like Grand Moff Tarkin crippled the Empire’s efforts, and how even though battles like those at Hoth looked like Imperial victories, they did more damage to the Empire than to the Rebellion.

This book is a well-written, detailed, and satisfying look at the history of the stories that we know so well. It draws from not only the films, but also comics, books, and television – any source available that explains the events surrounding the rise of the Empire, the Galactic Civil War, and the Empire’s fall and rebirth.

What makes this book believable is not only that it was written with the full help of the lorekeepers and writers of the Star Wars universe, but that it was written by an actual historian. Kempshall has been writing on war, especially World War One, and found himself in the very enviable position of being able to write a history of one of the most popular fictional universes of our time.

One aspect of this book that is truly fascinating is to see the places where the narrator, Beaumont Kin, lacks information that we, fans of the stories, absolutely have. For example, we all saw the fateful meeting at the beginning of A New Hope where Vader nearly force-chokes Admiral Motti to death. Kin, however, relies only on Motti’s own paperwork, referring to “an almost entirely redacted incident report within the Imperial Archives submitted by Admiral Motti immediately after that summit took place, presumably about something that happened to him during it.”

There are plenty of other places and references that Kempshall includes where he knows that fans of Star Wars will be able o fill in the gaps, having read the books and watched the cartoons, movies, and TV shows. Even more interesting is what he leaves out. There is no mention, for example, of Obi-Wan Kenobi and his role in the rescue of Vader’s children, or Yoda’s training of Luke. Ahsoka Tano, despite her role as the mysterious Fulcrum, is barely mentioned. Dr. Aphra, despite her strange and constant relationship with Darth Vader, only shows up a couple of times, usually in footnotes.

If there is one point of irritation that I have with this book, it’s the way that citations are handled.

It is great that this book is heavily cited – a proper history book should reveal its sources, allowing a reader to go and investigate for themselves, should they want to. The problem is, all of these are in-universe citations. So you might be directed to “New Republic Archives, Section: Adelphi Base, File: Requisition Form #1837p—Subcontract for fulfillment of refuse collection” if you want to know more about how New Republic officers used bounty hunters to go after Imperial remnants.

Now I appreciate kayfabe as much as the next guy, but a lot of these footnotes seemed like they should be pointing at specific literary sources – a show or a comic or something like that – and I really wanted to know what those were. I was hoping that, at the end of the book, there might be a listing of all the sources that Kempshall went to, but alas, there is none. This is a great, but missed opportunity.

The most striking thing, though, was not so much how well it recontextualized the Star Wars universe (and brought more sense to the Sequel Trilogy), but how relevant it was to our world. The rise of fascism, cruelty disguised as order, the seduction of ideology are all familiar to us. The book’s exploration of power and its misuse is painfully on-point, from the terrors of Fascist Europe all the way to the present day. It holds up the grand, sweeping tale of Star Wars as not only an allegory for past conflicts, but as a mirror to our own lives, our own willingness, perhaps, to allow wickedness to be done in our names.

Where the fictional historian narrator becomes angry or sad or frustrated with the terrible works that the Empire performed, you can easily understand how perhaps Kempshall is feeling the same way about our world.

We may not have a Sith Lord running things out here, but we do have petty, power-hungry tyrants; we have people willing to do terrible things because they were told to do them; we have leaders willing to ignore tragedy after tragedy because doing something about it is inconvenient.

This book would be an excellent addition to the collection of any Star Wars fan, and is the perfect answer to those people online who wish, against all available evidence, that Star Wars hadn’t suddenly gotten “all political.” It hasn’t gotten political – it always has been.


“The role of a historian—my role as a historian—is to try to tell you not just how but why these things happened. To try to make you understand the importance of these past events and what they mean for us today and tomorrow.”

Chris Kempshall at Penguin Random House
The Rise and Fall of the Galactic Empire on Goodreads

Leave a comment

Filed under Chris Kempshall, history, politics, science fiction, Star Wars